Rob Spec C
Octane Boostaholics
First of all, I'd like to state that i dont want to start any rows but i do think this is a good discussion/debate and should be allowed to continue.
Dave, does your car run better and have better gains since the map to E5 only instead of 95+lucas? From what you've said i assume yes?
Damo, you stopped mapping B4's after dave's because there were either too many problems or they were just too much hassle. Now you are back mapping them again and as you have said you had good results with dave's car running E5 alone. So where do you stand on mapping B4's on 95+lucas now? Do you still refuse to map them on 95+lucas? I am slightly confused, because surely if you are mapping them again, then its because something has changed and they are easier to map now, and the only thing thats changed is that E5 is available, then does that not mean that E5 is the better fuel to use? Is your only problem with E5 that you dont think its consistent enough or that its actually a bad fuel?
Now bare with me cause i may not explain this right and/or may be completely wrong. I personally noticed a big difference running E5 after resetting my ECU straight away. But, if for example on an unmapped B4 you use 95+booster which as you say is equivalent to 97 ron, then the ECU will retard itself 3 degrees compared to what its set for. So if originally set on jap fuel of 101 or 102 then the ECU will retard itself to run 98 or 99 ron? So best case scenario you are running 1 or 2 ron down. If you then switch to E5, even without resetting the ECU, then surely because the ECU is still set for 98 or 99 then it is possible that you notice an immediate difference?
Dave, does your car run better and have better gains since the map to E5 only instead of 95+lucas? From what you've said i assume yes?
Damo, you stopped mapping B4's after dave's because there were either too many problems or they were just too much hassle. Now you are back mapping them again and as you have said you had good results with dave's car running E5 alone. So where do you stand on mapping B4's on 95+lucas now? Do you still refuse to map them on 95+lucas? I am slightly confused, because surely if you are mapping them again, then its because something has changed and they are easier to map now, and the only thing thats changed is that E5 is available, then does that not mean that E5 is the better fuel to use? Is your only problem with E5 that you dont think its consistent enough or that its actually a bad fuel?
Now bare with me cause i may not explain this right and/or may be completely wrong. I personally noticed a big difference running E5 after resetting my ECU straight away. But, if for example on an unmapped B4 you use 95+booster which as you say is equivalent to 97 ron, then the ECU will retard itself 3 degrees compared to what its set for. So if originally set on jap fuel of 101 or 102 then the ECU will retard itself to run 98 or 99 ron? So best case scenario you are running 1 or 2 ron down. If you then switch to E5, even without resetting the ECU, then surely because the ECU is still set for 98 or 99 then it is possible that you notice an immediate difference?